Monday, March 3, 2008

Standing Up For What Is Right – Is it always the best way to handle something?


Is it always good to stand up to tell the truth? Should you always have the courage to stand up and do the right thing? Is standing up for oneself the best way to handle a situation? In most cases, these questions don’t need to be answered; the obvious answer is always that you should do what you believe and stand up for yourself. In fact, it sometimes is imperative that one does that. For example, someone’s life could depend on your courage to tell the truth, as it did in the Twelve Angry Men. I have always learned that telling the truth is always the preferred decision if you’re a very moral person who believes in justice. Is this the way we should handle all situations? Is it ever ok to not be truthful to yourself?
Its one thing to stand up for what you believe in, but it is another thing to be smart enough to stand up for what you believe in. In other words, if you are going to be assertive with other people, it is important that you have “quick” thinking. Part of standing up for yourself is having the ability to stand by your statement. Dont let your weakness show throughout your time with them. This is the reason juror number eight was so successful. He was able to stay “above the game” to prove his point.
In this play a boy’s life was solely on the shoulders of twelve jurors. In the jury room eleven men voted guilty, but one man, juror number eight, voted not guilty. Being truthful to himself had given him the courage to stand up against eleven angry men for the truth and in the end it saved an innocent young man’s life.
If juror number eight had not told the truth a young man’s life would have been gone. The other eleven jurors had voted not guilty solely on the idea that they wanted to get out of there “quicker.” Three and ten men were very intimidating people, in the play they were stuck on the idea of guilty, they weren’t very logical thinkers. All they wanted to believe was that a kid from the slums is definitely a killer. It is never good to think like that, and it was relieving that people like juror number eight were able to set these guys straight.
In conclusion, there are many reasons to stand up and tell the truth. Respect is given to people who are seen to be strong and courageous. Juror number eight had these traits and acted in this manner and was able to receive the respect of the other jurors. So the answer is yes, standing up for what is right is always the way to go. (and I don't mean die)
I hope you enjoyed this wonderful essay, and I would like to add a few things. First if you read this essay you should be convinced that the truth is the way to go. Finally, one man can make a difference if he has courage.

6 comments:

teddie said...

hi ariel!
Very inspirational blog! I agree that you should tell the truth. I also agree that the juror who stood up and told the truth was able to remain confident and became well respected.

Eitan said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Eitan said...

Hey Ariel,

It is definitely the right thing to tell the truth when it really matters, even if your going against everyone else. It is important to stand up for what you believe in, and not to let anyone discourage you and your opinion.

Nice blog, dude!

orly said...

nice blog ariel!
juror 8 was really courageous, and i can't say that most people would have the strength to stay with their verdict, especially when the many of the jurors seems so harsh towards him. but i really hope everyone has the courageous to stand up for the truth :)

Hava Y. said...

Hey ariel!
nice blog! you made some really good points.I totaly agree with what you say, how important it is for jurors to feel comfortable and open to share their honest feelings on the case.

afox said...

Hey Ariel,

I really like what you said and what you talked about. Because you started with all those questions, it really made me want to keep reading. I think that it was a very brave thing and a very good thing for jurror number 8 to stand up and go against the crowd. He said what he beleived even though he was in the vast minority. If he had not done that, they would have had a unanimous decision of guilty and the boy would have been charged guilty when he really was not.